Before You File
The allegations made will be taken seriously and could affect the career of the accused. Therefore, consider carefully the action you are about to take. It is expected that you have attempted to work out any conflict you have with the designee (or the company) prior to initiating the complaint.
It is important that the alleged violation not be confused with action required by the designee as a directive of the association's board of directors. For example, if a Reserve Specialist appears to have violated the code of ethics, but was following a directive given, it may not be a violation. The same situation may apply to a manager. The manager’s role is to enforce the Rules and Regulations appropriately adopted by the board and the governing documents of the community. A disagreement with the manager over their interpretation of a policy, rule or regulation of the board is not in and of itself a violation of the code of ethics.
If the allegation is criminal in nature (i.e., theft, embezzlement) appropriate authorities should be notified and information on the submission or outcome should be included with this form. Review of the complaint may be suspended until judgment has been issued by a court.
Filing the Complaint
To file a complaint, find out if the service provider holds a CAI designation and if so review the CAI Code of Ethics. Download and complete the complaint form against the designee and identify the article (or codes) you are alleging the designee to have violated. Compile a narrative summary and evidence to support your allegations. Please review the process and FAQ in this section before filing the complaint.
For the complaint to have merit, it must fit precisely into one or more of the ethical standards. Documentation should point clearly to the standard being violated. It is important that proper supporting evidence accompany the complaint with clear and concise documentation identifying what makes it a piece of evidence. Statements that are alleged to be made verbally by a designee without collaboration of a third party or recorded will not be considered as evidence. An exhibit should only be submitted once, and may reference several places in the complaint. Please do not submit the same piece of evidence multiple times. A lack of evidence could cause the complaint to be rejected. Consideration of the complaint will only begin after all pertinent information is received.
If you are collaborating with others in this complaint, only submit one complaint form. If complaints are received from multiple people submitting the same complaint that have the appearance of having been in collaboration, only one submission will be considered. Having multiple submissions does not add to the evidence. Complaints filed on behalf of a board must be accompanied by a signed resolution by a majority of the board stating the intent to file the complaint.
All areas of the form must be completed. If an area is to be left blank, enter the word "None" or "Not Applicable" so that it is clear to the committee that the part was not missed.
Ethics Complaint Process
Answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Below is a list of answers to frequently asked questions. Please note CAI staff members have no determination on whether allegations substantiate an ethical violation. Allegations are reviewed by volunteer professionals serving on the Designation Ethics Committee. The Committee assesses each complaint to ensure professionals holding CAI designations meet the requirements outlined by the Professional Code of Ethics. A formal complaint must be filed with our office in order for it to be reviewed by the ethics committee.
If you have further questions, please send them in an email to [email protected] with "Ethics Question" in the subject line.
-
Anyone may file a complaint against a professional holding a CAI designation (AMS, PCAM, LSM, AAMC, RS, CIRMS).
-
No. CAI only has enforcement over managers holding an AMS®, PCAM®, LSM®, management companies holding an AAMC ®, and specialists holding an RS® or CIRMS® designation. A disagreement with a board policy or decision that the service provider is tasked with enforcing or implementing is not an ethics violation.
CAI believes homeowner and condominium associations can and should exceed the expectations of their residents, and we have information and resources that can help.
-
No. CAI only has enforcement over managers holding an AMS®, PCAM®, LSM®; management companies holding an AAMC®; and specialists holding an RS® or CIRMS® designation(s). You may consider filing a complaint with the bar association where the association’s attorney practices.
-
The manager's role is to assit the board of directors with the administration of the association, including enforcement of the rules and regulations appropriately adopted by the association board and governing documents of the community. They are hired by an association’s board of directors and receive direction only by the board to represent the collective interests of all unit owners. Managers are not hired to represent individual interests. A disagreement with a board policy or decision that the manager is tasked with enforcing or implementing is not an ethics violation.
Depending on a community’s needs and hiring agreement, the most common responsibilities are the following:- Coordinates and supervises maintenance activities, such as landscaping, repairs, snow removal and trash pickup
- Manages human resources by:
- Ensuring compliance with Equal Employment Opportunities Commission (EEOC) guidelines
- Handling payroll
- Conducting employee reviews
- Conducting interview and hiring
- Advises the board of regulatory issues and compliance requirements regarding such matters as fair housing procedures, fair debt collection practices and FCC antenna regulations; alerts the board when legal assistance may be needed
- Handles or assists with association communications and/or social interactions
- Manages office operations:
- Accounts payable
- Accounts receivable
- Bookkeeping
- Filing
- Correspondence
- Manages association finances:
- Budgeting
- Collecting assessments
- Analyzing reserves
- Pursuing delinquencies
- Works with the association’s other professional partners, such as the attorney, CPA, auditors and insurance companies, as needed
- Carries out delegated officer duties
- Prepares proposals and screens applicants
Managers should not be required or expected to do the following:- Perform duties specifically assigned to the board by the governing documents, such as making rules or setting policy.
- Sign checks over a set amount without specific authorization.
- Waive rules, such as late fees, or negotiate with residents about rule compliance without good reason.
- Oversee the association’s annual audit. This should be done by an independent third party.
- Be the final authority in hiring or terminating vendors. They can make recommendations to the board, but the board should make the final decision.
- Initiate the filing of a lien against a homeowner.
- Dispense legal advice or other advice outside their areas of expertise.
-
Only if the service provider also holds a CAI Designation (AMS, PCAM, LSM, AAMC, CIRMS, and RS). CAI is only limited to enforcement over our designations.
The steps to filing a complaint against a CMCA may be found at www.camicb.org.
-
You may; however, CAI would most likely suspend the investigation of your ethics complaint pending the outcome of the criminal or civil investigation. The complainant and the respondent would be responsible for notifiying CAI of the outcome of the investigation
-
No. CAI is only limited to enforcement over our designations. In certain states, managers are required to be licensed. In a few of these states, a one pathway to licensure is having a CAI designation; however, these states allow multiple pathways for licensure, so CAI cannot prevent a someone from offering management services.
-
Please report it to CAI. We will issue a cease and desist order and consider legal options.
-
When CAI first receives the complaint, it is reviewed by staff then the chair of the ethics committee. If the chair determines the complaint requires further inquiry, then the full complaint, along with the name of the complainant, is sent to the accused designee.
-
It may take over six months for a complaint to proceed through every stage of the enforcement process.
Upon receipt of the complaint, CAI staff will transmit the complaint to the chair of the Designation Ethics Committee within 30 days. The chair will determine whether the complaint should be dismissed or should be investigated further and will notify CAI staff within 30 days. CAI will notify you when the complaint is sent to the chair and of the chair’s determination.
Should the complaint require further investigation, the designee will have 30 days to respond to the complaint and the investigation panel will have an additional 60 days to provide a determination.
Should the complaint be recommended for a hearing, the hearing and the appeal process may last 60 days.
For a graphic, see the Ethics Complaint Process.
-
Section F. of CAI Designation Ethics Enforcement Procedures provides the following five sanctions, which may be combined if recommended by a hearing panel:
- Successful completion of a CAI-approved course in community association ethics.
- Private letter of admonishment.
- Public censure.
- Suspension of CAI credentials or membership.
- Revocation of CAI credentials or membership.
Also note that CAI is not a licensing regime. Should a professional’s credential be revoked it will not prevent the professional from practicing. -
Only one submission will be considered when complaints are received from multiple people that appear in collaboration. Having multiple submissions will not add to the evidence. If multiple people wish to be party to the complaint, a signature page may be added (much like a petition). If a complaint is being filed on behalf of an association board, it must be accompanied by an approved Board Resolution signed by a majority of the Board authorizing said filing of Complaint.
Professional Misconduct - Public Sanctions
The Designation Ethics Committee investigates allegations of violations of the professional code of ethics by designation holders and applicants. The committee reviews the allegations and, if necessary, recommends to the CAI Board of Trustees sanctions against a designee or applicant. The Board of Trustees votes whether to adopt the recommendations of the committee. The following individuals or companies have received a sanction that includes a publication of the sanction for a violation of the Professional Code of Ethics.
Search our Directory of Credentialed Professionals to find an association professional near you.
Name | Designation(s) Revoked | Section(s) of Code | State | Year | Sanction |
Carol Armstrong | PCAM | Felony | NH | 2005 | Permanent Revocation of Designation |
John Raines | PCAM | 3, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11 | TX | 2006 | Permanent Revocation of Designation |
Nicole Hughes | AMS | 3, 5, 10 | NJ | 2007 | Permanent Revocation of Designation |
Susan Garret | AMS | 3, 10, 13 | TX | 2007 | Permanent Revocation of Designation |
Ceclia Guitierrez | AMS, PCAM | 1, 3, 13 | CA | 2009 | Permanent Revocation of Designation |
Mark Carstensen | AMS, PCAM | Felony | TX | 2009 | Permanent Revocation of Designation |
Jason Blackman | AMS, LSM, PCAM | 1, 3, 10, 13 | TX | 2010 | Permanent Revocation of Designation |
Tracy Reed | AMS | Felony | OH | 2011 | Permanent Revocation of Designation |
Linda Dodson | AMS | 3, 5, 10, 13 | NC | 2011 | Permanent Revocation of Designation |
Denise Keser | AMS, PCAM | Felony | NV | 2012 | Permanent Revocation of Designation |
Gina Combs | AMS, PCAM | Felony | VA | 2012 | Permanent Revocation of Designation |
Donald Yowell | AMS, PCAM | Failure to redesignate and comply with terms of sanction. | CO | 2016 | Permanent Revocation of Designation |
Glenn Dorsey | AMS, PCAM | Failure to redesignate and comply with terms of sanction. | FL | 2016 | Permanent Revocation of Designation |
Raymond Gonzalez | AMS | Felony | NJ | 2016 | Permanent Revocation of Designation |
Julie Salinas | AMS | State license revoked, Felony | CO | 2017 | Permanent Revocation of Designation |
Cynthia Wall | AMS, PCAM | 3, 4, 10, 13 | CA | 2017 | Permanent Revocation of Designation |
Ceasar Larrach | AMS | Felony | CA | 2018 | Permanent Revocation of Designation |
Robert Walsh | AMS | Felony | CA | 2018 | Permanent Revocation of Designation |
Jose Ponton | AMS, PCAM | 3,6,10,13 | VA | 2019 | Permanent Revocation of Designation |
Timothy Arel | AMS, PCAM | 1 and 3 | NH | 2020 | Permanent Revocation of Designation |
Kimberly Wood | AMS, PCAM | 1,3,5,10,12, and 13 | FL | 2020 | Permanent Revocation of Designation |
Pamela Voit | AMS, PCAM | 3 and 10 | CA | 2021 | Public Censure |
Kristina Codino | CMCA, AMS | 1,3,4,10,12, and 13 | VA | 2022 | Permanent Revocation of CAI Membership and Designation |